Friday, November 20, 2009

Random Thoughts at SBL

As I sit at the Huck Finn's Cafe in New Orleans, the following random thoughts are running through my mind:

Shrimp po-boys are wonderful!

Only at the Society of Biblical Literature Conference can you sit in an Arby's with someone you've never met and discuss Hebrew morphemes.

Portions of the French Quarter, especially Bourbon Street, can well be described as institutionalized debauchery.

I feel sorry for finicky eaters. When they come to a city like New Orleans, they are stuck eating the usual fare while the rest of us enjoy new and different things.

If the SBL conference hotels caved in, would the church noticeably miss the guild of biblical scholars in reference to its mission in the world?
.
Any restaurant that automatically has Tabasco Sauce on every table along with the salt and pepper is first-rate in my book!
.
Some scholars take themselves and their work much too seriously, while others know they are part of a long-line of diggers and dreamers that will continue long after they are dead.

There are some excellent papers given at SBL.

There are some terrible papers given at SBL.

On Sunday morning, I do not attend any sessions. I find a church in which to worship.

It is good to be a member of a society whose conference is in a different city each year.

Perhaps two of the great things about SBL is seeing old friends and visiting the book displays (and buying, of course).

And the best thing about SBL-- returning home to my family!

Thursday, November 19, 2009

The First Book in the Areopagus Critical Christian Issues Series

Here is the first book in the Areopagus Critical Christian Issues Series that I am co-editing. Christian Archy is written by my co-editor, David Alan Black. It is a must read. If you want to be challenged, then this is the book for you. If you don't like being challenged then this book is definitely for you.

What is the Kingdom of God? What does it mean to be part of the kingdom? These are questions that should occupy the mind of every Christian. But we frequently shy away from the full meaning of God's rule.

In Christian Archy, Dr. David Alan Black examines the New Testament to find the truly radical and all-encompassing claims of God's kingdom. In doing so, he discovers that the character of this kingdom is widely different from what is commonly contemplated today. Its glory is revealed only through suffering a point that Jesus' disciples, then and now, have been slow to understand. This truth has tremendous implications for church life. The kingdom of God is in no way imperialistic. It has no political ambitions. It conquers not by force but by love. It is this humble characteristic of the kingdom that is a stumbling block to so many today. Christ's claim to our total allegiance is one we seek to avoid at all costs. But there is only one way to victory and peace, and that is the way of the Lamb.

On My Way to New Orleans!

I am leaving this morning for The Society of Biblical Literature Conference in "The Big Easy." I will blog as I am able.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

On the Moral Obligation to Tell a Truthful Narrative

Story is intrinsic to our existence. Indeed, story is our existence. Life is an attempt to understand the narrative or narratives that makes sense of who we are or what we are about. It is not necessarily easy, however, to understand our narratives truthfully. We human beings are masters of twisting and turning the story in order to deceive ourselves in reference to what our narratives mean. We like determining the meaning of our story; and we will invent cover stories if need be in order to be the arbiters of our narrative.
.
For me, one of the most discouraging things about politics is the obvious attempt by politicians to twist the political narrative to their advantage. Both the Republican and Democratic Parties are currently experiencing deep divides within their respective Party (which I think is a good thing). But in order to control the narrative, representatives from each Party utter virtually the same talking points that insist the other side is narrow-mindedly monolithic while their own divisions are not really such; they simply demonstrate the diversity within their ranks that the other side refuses to allow. Tea Party supporters are planning to go after Republicans who have not touted the pure party line, while the MoveOn.org crowd target heretical centrist Democrats who have stepped outside the fold of liberal political orthodoxy. Both Parties point to the intolerance of the other side while ignoring the obvious dogmatism of their own. Both sides are reminiscent of the words of Jesus who condemned people for focusing on the splinters of others while they remained oblivious to the two-by-four protruding from their face. There are countless other examples, such as the current Administration refusing to take the blame for anything, spinning the presidential narrative by indicting the previous Administration every chance it gets; and the Republican Party in response spins the political story by diminishing the continual impact of actions by the previous Administration on current problems.
.
The main focus in telling the political narrative is accomplishing one's goal while retaining or gaining power. When this happens, it is no longer critical that one tell the narrative truthfully. A truthful narrative is important only insofar that it serves one's political ends. When the truth does not accomplish one's goals, it can simply be discarded, or at the very least, twisted into a hybrid of something deceptive.
.
For Christians, this is unacceptable. We have a moral obligation to tell our narrative truthfully. This is not necessarily easy. All of us struggle with the same failings and shortcomings as those in political office. But let us make no mistake that the most important thing in making sense of our story is not justifying our existence as it is, but understanding what it means to live under the Lordship of Jesus Christ. The goal of narrative interpretation is to tell the truth of who we are and what we are about. For Christians, the gospel story does not affirm us as we are, but it calls us to more than we are. That can only happen when we are willing to acknowledge the truth, no matter how painful it might be.
.
While I do believe it is possible for Christians to serve Christ in political office, I wonder how long they would be in office if they insisted on telling the political narrative truthfully because of their commitment to the Lordship of Christ in all areas of life, including politics. The fact that there are Christians who have made a career out of politics makes me wonder what kind of narrative they have decided to embrace.
.
+ + + + + + +
.
Cross-Posted at RedBlueChristian

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Divine Graffiti


The latter chapters of the book of Isaiah are written in the context of Israel's exile in Babylon. In 586 B.C. the southern kingdom of Judah was conquered and most of the inhabitants of Jerusalem were led off to a strange land to live. Exiled from their homeland and wondering why God had allowed them to suffer so, these latter chapters in the prophet are written in part to encourage God's people Israel to remain faithful in spite of their circumstances and in spite of the fact that they may wonder, at times, what good their faith is for them as they live their lives.

There were those in Israel who likely blamed God for their misery, but first they needed to blame themselves. Their exile was their fault. For several centuries they continually violated God's law, they worshiped false gods, lived immorally, put up with and even supported corrupt leadership; and they trusted more in themselves than in the divine one who had called them. Now they were away from their homeland living in a strange place. Often, the first step in dealing with a problem is to admit that you are the one who created it.

Nevertheless, having said that, at some point, God's people were surely wondering when enough was enough. Of course, they had made the mess they now found themselves in, but when would the price be paid, when would penance be sufficient, and at what point would Israel be allowed to begin again?

It is not easy to put life in a nice and neat order; neither is it possible to understand completely how God works in each and every situation. For we mortals time flies when we are having fun, and it drags on in the midst of difficult days. God, who stands outside of time in eternity, sees from a vantage point we can only wonder about. We wish God would work in our time, but God is the one who moves with us in time expecting that we continue to trust and live in faith, even though we wonder when and where and how we might find relief. If the people of God are to be faithful, they must be patient.

Through Isaiah God promises that in his divine time, he will deliver his people. It may not come soon enough for them, but it will arrive nonetheless:

Thus says the LORD: In a time of favour I have answered you, on a day of salvation I have helped you; I have kept you and given you as a covenant to the people, to establish the land, to apportion the desolate heritages; saying to the prisoners, 'Come out', to those who are in darkness, 'Show yourselves.' They shall feed along the ways, on all the bare heights shall be their pasture; they shall not hunger or thirst, neither scorching wind nor sun shall strike them down, for he who has pity on them will lead them, and by springs of water will guide them. And I will turn all my mountains into a road, and my highways shall be raised up 49:8-11).

God does indeed promise deliverance and restoration; in the meantime they must know and trust that God is with them. God has not abandoned his people in the past and he will not do so in the present. There are those who say that the Almighty has forgotten; that perhaps God has moved on to another people, but Isaiah insists that this is not true.

Can a woman forget her nursing-child, or show no compassion for the child of her womb? Even these may forget, yet I will not forget you. See, I have inscribed you on the palms of my hands; your walls are continually before me (49:15-16).

It surely seems impossible for a mother to forget the child she carried and gave birth to. Sadly, there are some who do, even though most do not. For most mothers the thoughts of a child are always close at hand even when they are away from home. But God's love and compassion for us are deeper and more profound than the most loving and compassionate mom. The analogy of God inscribing our names on his hands is not an image meant to convey that God has to do something so he will not forget us; rather it is meant to demonstrate that God loves us so much, that he purposely puts us in front of him because of the joy God has in loving us.

Most homes have pictures of family on the walls and other places throughout the house, not for the purpose of having to be reminded of whom we are related to, but rather we display the images of those persons who mean so much to us. Photos of family members in our homes and in our wallets and purses do not serve as reminders; they are displays of love. We put their photos in prominent places precisely because we could never forget them.

And so it is in Isaiah. God has put our names before him, not because he is afraid of forgetting us, but it is a display of his love for us. And in knowing this, it serves as a reminder to us that in the midst of life and, yes, even in the midst of its difficulties, God has not forgotten about us, God has not abandoned us, God has not left us to ourselves.

God takes our lives and brings them into his life; and while the character of God never changes, God nevertheless journeys with us as we grow in relationship with him. Isaiah reminds us that God's divine graffiti does not serve as a reminder to God, but a rather it is a reminder to us that God is indeed with us.

And perhaps Isaiah 49 is a preview of a day, centuries later, when God in the flesh would have our names, our lives, inscribed into his hands with the nails of a cross.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Reflections on Revelation #6: The Divine Meaning of History

.
In the throne room of heaven on the right hand of the One on the throne, there is a scroll of unprecedented importance. It is written on the inside of the scroll and on the back, something not often done as it was more difficult to write on the reverse side of the scroll, which was against the grain of the papyrus. It is sealed seven times to insure its secrecy; for it contains the full account of the destiny of the world and human history. It is a book on the course of history (see Psalm 139:16).

An angel appearing as a town crier calls for one who is worthy to break the seals and open the scroll. The summons has been put forth through all of creation and no one is found who is worthy to reveal the meaning of history. No one is able to read and ponder the scroll's words. It appears as if the promise of Revelation 4:1, "Come up here, and I will show you what must take place after this," will remain unfulfilled. Understandably, John breaks down in bitter weeping. Without the unrolling of the scroll, John's plan for creation will be circumvented. The destiny of the world will no longer be assured.

But, John is now assured that the scroll will indeed be opened. One of the elders tells him that there is one who has indeed conquered and therefore is worthy to break the seals and unlock the meaning of history. The Lion of the Tribe of Judah is worthy. And as John gazes upon the Lion, he sees not a strong and mighty beast, but a small lamb; and it is a lamb that has been slaughtered as a sacrifice. And yet, this slaughtered lamb is standing ready to act. Here is the key to the book of Revelation-- God does not conquer evil with the sword, but through cross and resurrection!

Any attempt to envisage a literal seven-horned, seven-eyed lamb will discover that the meaning of the vision is missed. John's vision is symbolic in character. This scene in the throne room of heaven is not descriptive, but symbolic of the decrees and action of God in human history, in particular as it centers on the cross and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Now that the Lamb has creation and its destiny in his hand, John witnesses a scene of universal worship. Three reasons make the Lamb worthy to open the scroll: 1) he was slaughtered, 2) his death purchased women and men for God, and 3) he made those whom he purchased a kingdom and priests.

It must not be missed that the same kind of adoration given to the Lamb in chapter five is quite similar to the worship given to the One on the throne in chapter four.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

A Prayer for the Twelfth Sunday in Kingdomtide

Gracious God, it is in some ways not correct for us to come to you in prayer asking for your presence, as if it might be the case that you are not here with us. Remind us that you are always with us; especially in those days when the circumstances of life may make it appear you are far away. Remind us as well, that you have never promised us that life would always be the way we want it, but you have always promised your presence and you love in this life filled with its imperfections, disappointments, and difficulties. Hear our prayer this day, in the name of Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior, who remained faithful even when he faced dark and difficult days. Amen.

Friday, November 13, 2009

No MBWR

There will be no Weekly Roundup this weekend due to illness (mine); neither will there be one next weekend as I will be in New Orleans at the Society of Biblical Literature Conference.

The MBWR will return the weekend of November 28/29.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Some Sane and Rational Thoughts on the Economy

I have said before on this blog that I like to read the words of individuals who make me think. I do not seek to surround myself only with people who agree with me. Those who only want to spend their time with the like-minded are impoverished intellectually.

I have my places of disagreement with Dr. Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University, but I find his reflections on the economy and how the government is simply going down the same road that got us into trouble in the first place to be very compelling. I have linked his thoughts that he expressed yesterday on Morning Joe for your consideration.

What I find troubling is that it seems that the people who truly know what they are talking about are not in the White House nor Congress. The wise are being led by the ignorant.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Reflections on Veterans Day

A Salute to Our Military

Honor Veterans Today, Every Day

Veterans Day: Remembering the Sacrifices

Homeless on Veterans Day

Veterans Day is as Relevant as Ever

In addition, today is Remembrance Day for our British and Canadian cousins. I found this post from Richard Hall at Connexions to be profoundly moving.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Irrelevant Facts for Irrelevant Conversation

Some irrelevant facts that will convince your friends that you are a treasure trove of completely useless information:

-A cockroach can live several weeks with its head cut off--it dies from starvation!

-The electric chair was invented by a dentist!

-George Washington grew marijuana in his garden.

-If you put a raisin in a glass of champagne, it will keep floating to the top and sinking to the bottom.

-It's impossible to sneeze with your eyes open.

-Non-dairy creamer is flammable.

-Snails can sleep for 3 years without eating.

-The car in the foreground on the back of a $10 bill is a 1925 Huptmobile.

-There are no rivers in Saudi Arabia.

-Women blink nearly twice as much as men.

-Cat urine glows under a black-light!

-Over 10,000 birds a year die from smashing into windows!

-A duck's quack doesn't echo. No one knows why.

-Ancient Egyptians shaved off their eyebrows to mourn the deaths of their cats.

-It is illegal to be a prostitute in Siena, Italy if your name is Mary.

-Lady Astor once told Winston Churchill "if you were my husband, I would poison your coffee." His reply... "if you were my wife, I would drink it!"

-Montpelier, Vermont is the only U.S. state capital without a McDonald's.

-Our eyes are always the same size from birth, but our nose and ears never stop growing.

-The screwdriver was invented before the screw.

Want more information on any of these?-- Just Google it.

Monday, November 09, 2009

Yale Theologian Miroslav Volf Preaches at the Crystal Cathedral

Sunday, November 08, 2009

Opinion Central Poll 2009.47: Final Results

A Prayer for the Eleventh Sunday in Kingdomtide

Blessed Lord, who has caused all holy Scriptures to be written for our learning: Grant that we may in such wise hear them, read, mark, learn, and inwardly digest them, that, by patience and comfort of your holy Word, we may embrace and ever hold fast the blessed hope of everlasting life, which you have given us in our Savior Jesus Christ; who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.

The Book of Common Prayer

Saturday, November 07, 2009

The Methodist Blogs Weekly Roundup 2009.29.208

Submit your post to umweeklyroundup@yahoo.com by noon EST on Saturday to guarantee that your post is included.

The week in review in the Methoblogosphere:

Andrew Thompson writes on the power of Holy Communion.

Dave Nichols posts on All Saints' Sunday and grief.

Bishop Robert Schnase on missing the recognition of the moment.

Thoughts on pastoral leadership in stewardship according to Bishop William Willimon.

Reflections from Brian Vinson on being alone.

Sally Coleman is in search of a new way.

You better hurry-- Mark Winter's One Man Show is booking fast!

Dave Faulkner asks, "Is Steve Jobs a model for preachers?"

Brian Russell offers his top ten Bible passages.

Michael Daniel writes on rights vs. right.

The agenda of the Holy Spirit-- some thoughts from Ken Carter.

Dave Perry is dredging up the past to replenish the present and shape the future.

Jim Parsons cogitates on being called by God and sharing our stories.

Seasons (of the gospel) and the church-- reflections from Andy Bryan. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Olive Morgan reminds us that Christmas is coming.

Andrew Stoddard posts reflections on Ezra 7:1-16, Revelation 14:1-13, and Matthew 14:1-12.

Are you now or have you ever been?... well, get the rest of the question from Tony Mitchell.

Kim Matthews ponders our status as refugees.

Greg Hazelrig posts his thought for the day on John 21:15.

Steve Heyduck on giving advice.

Deb Spaulding is hangin' out with Hezekiah.

There is evidence of life for Questing Parson.

John Meunier posts on making the church younger.

Some thoughts on God in the ordinary from Lorna Koskela.

Daniel McLain Hixon shares his thoughts on evangelism by trendiness. Best of the Methoblogosphere!

Joseph Yoo comments on why Scripture is important.

Henry Neufeld issues a note on independent voters.

Reflections on listening and speaking out from Angela Shier-Jones.

Dan Dick writes on running church.

Joseph Slife reports on the Judicial Council's recent decisions on a sexuality statement and apportionments.

Mitch Lewis preaches on the wheat and the tares together sown.

David Hallam is troubled by Jesus, Queen of Heaven.

When you die, will you have a digital executor? Read Gavin Richardson.

"Giving Thanks: For All the Saints"-- a sermon by Beth Quick.

Rick Mang tells us that a friend of his recently met a hero of his.

Friday, November 06, 2009

What Independents Want

An excellent editorial by David Brooks.

The Myth of the Good Old Days

There's lots of bad stuff going on in the world today. A natural worrywart would have a feast wigging out over what is happening in the world and right here in the good ole' U.S. of A. How many times I hear people speaking of the good old days, of simpler times when life wasn't so complicated, when it was safe to let children run free in public and when everyone supposedly went to church every Sunday.

I dissent from such a view. There is no such thing as the good ole' days. It is a myth constructed by people with amnesia who have forgotten or have chosen not to remember the problems and perils of earlier days. Allow me to offer some evidence:

-An estimated 20% of American children live in poverty today. More lived in poverty in 1900 and an estimated 20% lived in orphanages because their parents couldn't afford them.

-In the nineteenth century the age of sexual consent in several states was nine or ten.

-In the 1920s, no law required a divorced father to pay child support.

-Near the end of 1943, Life Magazine ran an article on juvenile delinquency which highlighted among other things, teenagers smoking marijuana and teenage girls waiting to be picked up by soldiers. The article states, "Too many Victory Girls believe it is part of patriotism to deny nothing to servicemen."

-At the beginning of the Civil War, there were proportionately as many abortions being performed annually as there are today.

-The murder rate in the 1930s was as high as in the 1980s.

-In the earlier part of the twentieth century, divorce rates were not nearly as high as they are today, but comparatively the rates of desertion and domestic violence were much higher than in the twenty-first century.

-Today approximately two-thirds of Americans do not go to church. In the nineteenth century the percentage was... two-thirds.

-Preacher and theologian Jonathan Edwards was criticized by fellow Christians for being too stuffy when it came to sexual morality.

-In the period of the American Revolution, it was not uncommon for an engaged couple to have sex prior to marriage.

-The child sex slave trade was just as prevalent one hundred years ago as it is today.

-It is estimated that in the middle of the nineteenth century, there was one prostitute for every 64 men in New York City.

-With all the talk about the problems of health care in the U.S., would anyone prefer the medical practices of 1910? (By the way, the greatest factor for the longer life spans in the developed world today is not the result of today's medicine, but modern methods of sanitation.)

-We talk about pollution today, but one hundred years ago people thought nothing of dumping all kinds of things into streams and lakes and blowing toxic smoke into the air.

-We understandably are concerned about all the additives put in food today, but one hundred and fifty years ago, food poisoning from "all-natural" foods was much more common than it is today.

I could go on and on, but instead I will simply list some sources below where much more information and examples can be obtained.

None of this is to suggest that everybody was wicked and rotten a hundred years ago. There were plenty of good and decent people then as there are now. But we must dispel ourselves of the notion that there was some golden era in American history (or any history for that matter) when all was pure and pristine, wonderful and lovely. Along with that we must also reject the belief that everything is much worse today than it was "back then." This does not mean we should fail to take our problems and challenges seriously, but a little less of "the sky is falling" hysteria would be a good thing... and unfortunately, we have too many "Chicken Littles" cackling around us.

---

Selected Sources

Dean Merrill, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry Church. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1997

Stephanie Coontz, The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trap. Basic Book, 1992.

Life Magazine 15, No. 25 (20 December 1943).

+ + + + + + +

Cross-Posted at RedBlueChristian

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Truth is Stranger than Fiction 2009.22

Ohio police say man dressed as Breathalyzer for Halloween accused of DUI

Nov 4, 4:47 PM EST

OXFORD, Ohio (AP) -- An Ohio man dressed as a Breathalyzer test for Halloween found himself blowing into one after police stopped him for allegedly driving the wrong way without headlights on a one-way street. Oxford police said they stopped 20-year-old James P. Miller on Halloween night and found beer in his front seat and in the trunk.

Police said Miller blew 0.158 percent on a Breathalyzer test. The legal limit for driving is a blood-alcohol level of .08.

Miller was cited on charges including operating a vehicle while intoxicated, underage possession of alcohol, having an open container and a fake ID, and a one-way street violation.

Miller had no comment when reached at home Wednesday.

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Elections Are Never Mandates

Yesterday's elections results are now being spun by both political parties to their advantage. Most Democrats are minimizing losing two governorships in Virginia and New Jersey, while Republicans are hailing their victories as a shot across the bow at Democrats in Congress and President Obama. In truth, both sides are overplaying their hand, which should not be surprising. Nevertheless, Republicans have reason to be happy today, though their celebration should be guarded, and Democrats ought to be concerned, although they are hardly on the path to minority party status.

The first lesson that politicians should have learned a long time ago but have not, is that, contrary to popular political mythology, elections are never mandates from the American people. Yes, there are those partisans on both sides who want their party to ram their agenda down the collective throat of the country come hell or high water, but most voters are not so ideologically driven. For the most part, elections are not expressions of confidence in someone or one group of politicians as they are a no confidence vote in those who fail to get elected. The reason the Republicans controlled all facets of government up until 2006 was because the American people lacked confidence in the Democratic party to govern. In 2006, we began to see the public's lack of trust in the Republicans. Thus, the 2008 election that swept the Democratic party into the White House along with bigger majorities on Capitol Hill, was not a show of support for those elected as much as a no-confidence vote in those who had been in office. Change elections are really a "get rid of the bums" kind of event. Yes, I know that there were more than a few, particularly young people, who were part of the "Obama Messianic Movement," but most supporters of President Obama are more realistic and down-to-earth. Unfortunately, what has happened in the last year is that the Democratic party, newly in power, has assumed, on account of their hubris, that the American people have given them a mandate for their agenda, for their political program. Such an extreme approach to governing is starting to result, ever so slowly in another "get rid of the bums" election now directed at the other side of the aisle.

But what yesterday's results reveal is that the American people will not tolerate politicians gone wild in either foreign or domestic policy. The American people were fed up with George W. Bush's hubris on foreign policy, and yesterday they indicated that they are not pleased with the hubris shown by President Obama and the Democrats in the last ten months on domestic affairs. If the Republicans think that the gaining of two governorships now means that "new winds are blowing" as RNC Chair Michael Steele said this morning, they over-estimate what the American people think of the Republican Party's ability to govern in all matters. At the same time, if the Democrats interpret yesterday's results only as the public's frustration at their inability to put forward their agenda on health care, etc., they have badly misunderstood that a segment of the American people, who are likely representative of a certain cross-section of the country, have only one year after an historic election, sent a not-so-subtle message to them that their election did not mean a mandate in support of more government control of the private sector and the mortgaging of their children's and grand children's future in wild deficit spending.

Elections are never mandates; they are temporary charges given to a few people by many people, who expect those so elected to govern humbly and reasonably. If politicians and political parties took themselves and their views less seriously, they might, at some point, come to understand this.

+ + + + + + +

Cross-Posted at RedBlueChristian

Opinion Central Poll 2009.46: Final Results